Nikken Sekkei has consistently pioneered seismic design while staying ahead of building codes, which are revised after every earthquake.
In the late 1960s, during the early days of skyscraper design, building vibration simulations were conducted using only a few types of seismic motion that had actually been observed at that time.Typical examples include the seismic records from El Centro, California, during the 1940 Imperial Valley earthquake and the ground motion observed in Hachinohe, Aomori Prefecture, during the 1968 Tokachi-oki earthquake. In other words, seismic data observed at locations unrelated to the planned construction site were used for design purposes.Since these seismic motions were not strong enough to represent the long-period seismic motions—which are believed to have a significant impact on buildings of 30 stories or more—there was a concern that the shaking would be underestimated.
Initially, it was standard practice to evaluate ground surface acceleration when discussing the magnitude of seismic motion. At Nikken Sekkei, we were among the first to adopt the evaluation of ground surface velocity—which correlates more strongly with building damage than acceleration—and have been using it to determine design input seismic motions.
In 1988, we independently developed a simulated design earthquake motion (ART WAVE) that adequately incorporated long-period vibration components, and have been using it for structural analyses of super-high-rise buildings.In 2000, 12 years after the development of ART WAVE, a revision to the law led to the Ministry of Construction issuing a notification specifying the intensity of seismic motion—including long-period seismic motion—that must be considered in the design of super-high-rise buildings and similar structures. Seismic motion data created in accordance with this regulation is sometimes referred to as “notification waves.”However, neither ART WAVE nor the design simulation seismic motion specified in the notification fully reflected the characteristics of individual earthquakes or the site-specific ground conditions of the planned construction site.
Following the 1995 Hyogo Prefecture Government Southern Japan Earthquake, the national earthquake monitoring system was rapidly established, and earthquake-related research in Japan advanced by leaps and bounds, resulting in the accumulation of extensive knowledge in fields such as seismology, earthquake engineering, and seismic resistance engineering.Based on this knowledge, Nikken Sekkei spent six years starting in 1999 developing NS Wave® to incorporate seismic motions that simulate the actual phenomena expected at the project site into structural design, and has been using NS Wave® for structural design since 2005.Subsequently, in 2016, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) published simulated seismic motions for design purposes—referred to as “long-period notification”—based on the assumed Nankai Trough earthquake.These seismic motions, known as “Site-Specific Seismic Motions,” are tailored to account for the specific conditions of the project site. Nikken Sekkei has once again taken the lead in adopting seismic motions that account for such site-specific conditions, even before relevant regulations were established.
I believe that the reason we have consistently been ahead of changes in the law is that, rather than simply adhering to revised regulations, we have continued to conduct structural design by considering—in light of the times—what is truly important for buildings, building owners, and the users of those buildings, and by developing the new technologies necessary to achieve that.